Sigma DP1 Macro Samples
The purpose of this test is to compare some common close-up lenses. Working range is given for each lens. The first figure is the nearest distance focus is achieved, the second, the most distant. While you might think that +1 or +2 isn’t enough magnification to be useful, consider that +2 decreases the closest working distance from about 24cm (9.45”) to 16cm (6.3”), while still allowing focus up to 51cm (20”) which might prove useful when photographing flowers or wildlife.
We usually try to use normal to tele focal lengths with a close-up lens to minimize distortion and increase working distance. The challenge here is starting with a 28mm focal length There’s no getting around the “pincushion” distortion created when a macro filter is added, though it’s barely noticeable at +4 and under.
Don’t write off a lens based solely on its’ corner to corner sharpness or by the amount of pincushion distortion it produces. Depending on the application, these flaws might be unnoticed (photographing flowers or insects for instance). Other flaws, like the CA seen in the corners of some of these samples are harder to hide.
When the new Sigma AML-1 is available, we’ll add it to this comparison.
When lenses are combined, the higher power lens goes on first (except for the B&W +10 which has no outside thread, so is always placed last.) The optical power of the combined lenses is approximately the sum of the individual optical powers of each lens.
All images shot raw and processed in SPP3 JPEG quality 10 full size. We've provided both the full size 100% sample as well as a 100% corner crop for those with slower connections.
Click here for depth of field (DOF) samples. We shot each sample at f4 and f10. Not a perfect test because DOF is being measured at an angle, but a good approximation. Half size crops shown, 1 mm increments.
Click here to see how these lenses look with a different subject.
Hoya +10 52mm
![]()
Working Distance: 65mm - 95mmB&W +10 52mm
![]()
Working Distance: 62mm - 82mm
![]()
![]()






